Looks like this issue should have some file attached but doesn't.. it's a
follow-up of issue 25832 for the i18npool breakiterator part (presumably the
very same patches were meant to be attached?), so I take it under reserve that
that issue's other patches get accepted => dependency. Aligning release target.

Eike

*** Issue 27926 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

Ayaniger,

Can I expect some further input on this issue? Is the patch meant to be attached
to this issue identical to the one of issue 25832 or is it a different one? I'll
close this issue if no further input is given. Please work on the suggestions
given in issue 25832, and also answer Kevin's question whether you signed the
JCA in issue 25832, and please state your real name so we can look it up in the
JCA list.

Eike

There won't be more input on this issue. The patch meant to be attached
to this issue is in fact identical to the one of issue 25832., so I'll do
further work there.
My real name is Alan Yaniger, I work for Tk Open Systems, and we've signed a
corporate JCA several times.

Alan,

Thanks for the update. I will use the breakiterator from issue 25832 and submit
it to the ooo112fix1 CWS.

Please bear in mind that for OOo2.0 based on the src680 code line we need a
different breakiterator patch, please create a separate issue for that when ready.

Eike

Added to branch cws_srx645_ooo112fix1:

i18npool/inc/breakiterator_unicode.hxx  1.5.86.1.2.1
i18npool/source/breakiterator/breakiterator_unicode.cxx  1.12.42.1.2.1
i18npool/source/breakiterator/data/Attic/dict_word_he.h  1.1.2.1
i18npool/source/registerservices/registerservices.cxx  1.30.42.1.2.1

@Alan: breakiterator_unicode.hxx patch was missing in your tar file, and next
time if you contribute patches _please_ use _unified_ diffs (diff -u), not a
simple line based diff. I had to manually reorder lines of code because in the
meantime also the Hungarian patches were added.

setting as verfied

closing